Check out the updated 2008 email design guidelines
As 2005 draws to a close, I thought I'd take the opportunity to outline what I think are some of the key email design trends and guidelines that we should all be paying attention to now and into the new year.
This certainly isn't an exhaustive list, but to me these are the key issues that seem to be overlooked in most of the emails I receive and a great deal that are sent through Campaign Monitor.
We're all busy people, so here's a summary of what you should be doing to meet each of the guidelines.
If you're interested in the reasons behind these tips and learning just how important they are, read on.
Here's something you might not know. Today, anyone using AOL, Gmail, Outlook 2003, Outlook Express and the latest versions of many ISPs email software will never see images in any emails you send them by default.
Now read that again so it really sinks in. For many of you, that can add up to more than half of everyone you ever send email to. But don't take my word for it. Here's a quick rundown of which major ISPs and email clients block your images:
| Image Blocking by Major ISPs & Email Clients | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blocking Issue | AOL Versions 6.0-9.0 |
Gmail | Hotmail | Yahoo | Outlook 2000/XP |
Outlook 2003 |
Outlook Express w/SP2 |
Outlook Express w/o SP2 |
|
| External images are blocked by default | |||||||||
| User controls image-blocking settings | |||||||||
| User clicks link to enable message's images | N/A | ||||||||
| Images enabled if sender is in user's address book/buddy list | |||||||||
| Images autoenabled if sender is on ISP whitelist | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||
| Alt tags displayed when images disabled | N/A | ||||||||
| Preview window featured included | |||||||||
| Note: SP2 = Service Pack 2 upgrade for Windows XP | Source: EmailLabs |
When images are turned off, that design you worked so hard on can be turned into an ugly mash of broken images and reformatted content. Let's take an example of how nasty this can get from a recent email I received from Apple announcing the long awaited iTunes Australia Music Store.
![]() |
![]() |
Just makes you want to dive in and buy a few albums doesn't it! Now, I'm sure when they were putting together the creative they got all excited about their recipients seeing the version on the right, but how many potential customers did they lose when many of their recipients saw the version on the left?
While the Apple example is at the extreme end of things, many of us commit lesser but just as dangerous email design sins every day. Here are a few tips to minimize the damage of your images not being displayed:
Here are a couple of samples sent by Campaign Monitor customers of email designs that are still very readable even with images disabled:
Webnames.ca Corporate Newsletter
![]() |
![]() |
VIEW News
![]() |
![]() |
You can see more examples of great email design in our design gallery.
Today, up to half of your recipients could be using their email client's preview panes to decide if your email's even worth checking out. A preview pane shows a little vertical or horizontal snippet of your email that is often no more than 2-4 inches in height or width.
While most web based email clients don't use them yet, recent betas of Yahoo! Mail and Hotmail indicate they will be soon. In the corporate email scene, around 90% of email clients support preview panes.
Combine this with images being turned off by default and you quickly see that what your recipient first sees is often completely different to what you're sending them.
Around 75% of people who use preview panes go for the horizontal version, while the remaining 25% prefer the vertical version. The screenshots below show either option taken at 1024 x 768 resolution on a PC running Outlook 2003 with images enabled.
![]() |
![]() |
At resolutions of 1024 x 768 or less, you really need to be diligent in your design to ensure enough is shown to the recipient to encourage them to check out the whole email.
If you were hedging your bets, then you'd certainly be giving more preference to the horizontal preview pane. In a perfect world though, you'd be covering all bases by ensuring the best bits of your email appear in the top-left corner and therefore in everyone's preview pane.
To encourage preview pane users to open your email, you should:
There's never been a more important time to ask your subscribers to add your From address to their address book. AOL and Yahoo! allow your recipients to filter emails from unknown senders. Plus, images are displayed by default if you're in the address book for all AOL and Hotmail recipients as well as anyone using Outlook or Outlook Express.
The efforts to get added to your recipient's address book don't start and finish with a request in each email, you should ask the question at every touch point possible. As an example, here's our subscriber confirmation page. All our newsletters are sent using the From address of davidg@campaignmonitor.com, so once you ask people to add you to their address book, make sure you use the same From address every time you send to them.
At a minimum, make sure this request is made:
If you've got any thoughts on what issues you think will be important in email design over the next 12 months, then I'd love to hear your thoughts.
21st December
I always recommend users be given the option to receive HTML or Text-only emails. HTML is always the clear winner.
As a reader, I may glance at a text-only message and be drawn in for more. This is a very business-like approach that works well for follow-up, confirmation, or critical messaging from a company to its consituents. Conversely, all HTML messages are too easily pitched; the right-click-for-images is less than a second away, but without engagement your subject really has to sell and the sender must be relevant. The best blend is text that is legible within HTML formatting that can be electively turned on. This provides the best chance to engage the user and sell the next step: view the images or click straight through.
With regard to tracking, real marketers (not SPAMers) use these techniques to see what’s working. Sure we’re here to help promote a product, but that’s what drives our business. The true “burn rate” in email marketing is opt-outs, so we owe it to our clients (and more importantly those on their contact list) to send salient messages that provide value and maintain a relationship. Tracking user performance is more than building a better mousetrap, for those doing it right it’s about building a better relationship.
Long live choice, trust, and respect for others onliine! - ThomFlash
4th January
What about support for PNGs?
Is there a breakdown of the e-mail clients that do not support PNGs (like IE6) without a hack?
5th June
We have a subscription base of mostly Lotus Notes users - does anyone have any tips or tricks for delivery via Campaign Monitor to these users?
6th June
Dan, we’ve tested what CSS does and doesn’t work in Lotus Notes here if you’re interested. Plus, our free templates have been tested in Notes and render pretty well.
22nd August
Very good article.
As a graphic designer, HTML is the norm. It’s just natural to pay more attention to a nice looking 400x250 e-mailer than read a full page of text.
Haven said that, there must be a balance between graphics and text, and that applies to both web and print. Unless you are a lawyer, the tendency is to avoid lengthy text… then againg my girlfriend loves to read a lot.
Anyone who straight up says that only one or the other method must be used, it’s just being naive. Caf or Decaf people? It’s always good to choices.
19th September
<a></a>
19th September
<a></a>
27th September
http://index11.xesasyj.cn
27th September
Thanks for your article!
It is very useful for me, keep update.
27th September
http://index12.hukigyk.cn
27th September
http://index11.licalek.cn
27th September
http://index11.vumigin.cn
6th December
This guide was great for me as I am a beginning email designer.
Thanks
30th April
I appreciate your guide, but at the end of the day we are still faced with the question ‘how much are we going to push it?’ Thats something we must answer for ourselves.
Personally l like the idea of pushing it a little, of letting a few things break (in a controlled way)... that way we’re not saying to Microsoft or Gmail ‘hey, we’re getting along fine, but you know it would be nice if you…’, but rather, ‘hey, this is broken right now. You aren’t performing as well as the others. Word gets round… how else would you explain Firefox’s staggering piece of the pie?’
As a reader-of-emails, and I know this is influenced by my design background, but if the e-mail isn’t graphic, I figure they didn’t put energy into it, and I’m less likely to read it. It’s that simple. If “ooh shiny” isn’t a compelling factor than Macintosh wouldn’t exist.
7th June
Great article! I definitely recommend the “if you are having toruble” link at the top of any HTML email you send out! It guarantees an opportunity for the viewer to see the campaign as it was meant to be seen.
Realy thanks - good job!
27th June
I’m gonna present my designs soon. thx for inspiration ;-)