Many people, either by email client defaults or personal preference, are blocking images in the HTML-formatted messages they are accepting. And then there are a small number of people who block HTML entirely. According to a study by Merkle in 2009, only 48% of email recipients see images automatically… In any case, it’s logical for recipients to block images and good practice for us to prepare for this scenario.
So what happens to our emails when images are blocked? What are the best practices for ensuring accessibility and optimizing presentation therein? What are default settings across the board? Let’s get down to answering these questions.
Proceed with caution. We should be giving serious consideration to image-blocking and what we can do about it. It’s natural and reasonable why people disable them, but with the right approach we can improve the experience for our subscribers.
Every client has its own default settings regarding displaying/hiding images. And while most email clients have a setting to turn images on or off, some offer conditional settings which are contingent upon known senders or other factors. The following table outlines the default settings of popular desktop- and webmail-clients. (Note that We are using the settings of our own versions of each client and that settings may differ from one version to another).
We have included contextually-relevant references to ALT attributes as part of this article. For a more in-depth look at how ALT attributes render in popular email clients, see our ALT attributes research.
| Email Client | Images displayed by default | Images disp. for trusted senders | Renders ALT Text |
| Desktop clients | |||
| Outlook 2007 | No | Yes | Info |
| Outlook 2003 | No | Yes | Yes |
| Outlook for Mac 2011 | No | Yes | Yes |
| Outlook Express | Yes | No | Yes |
| Windows Live Hotmail | No | Yes | Yes |
| Apple Mail | Yes | No | No |
| Thunderbird | No | Yes | Yes |
| AOL Desktop | No | Yes | No |
| Lotus Notes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Webmail clients | |||
| Hotmail | No | Yes | No |
| Yahoo! Mail Beta | No | Info | Yes |
| Gmail | No | Yes | No |
| AOL Webmail | No | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile clients | |||
| iPhone/iPad | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Android default | No | No | Yes |
| Android Gmail | No | Info | No |
| Windows Mobile 7 | No | No | No |
| Blackberry OS6 | No | No | Yes |
So now that we’ve covered the settings in popular email clients, let’s outline how we can help our emails survive image blocking.
From a designers perspective, an email is successful when it meets the following goals:
Looking at this list it becomes clear just how important it is to consider image blocking when designing/developing an email. Dependency on images can lead to failures on many different levels. Preparing for a scenario in which images are disabled puts us at an advantage to oblige the settings/preferences of a broader range of recipients.
Nearly every email client in my test suite enables people to automatically display images when a message is from a “known sender” (senders appearing in white lists, contact lists or address books). Because our subscribers have requested to receive emails from us, they will naturally want to ensure they receive the messages. Spam filters can disrupt legitimate communication when subscribers are unaware of how they function. With a couple, simple notifications we can increase our chances of success:
Informing a subscriber about this simple step will increase our chances of images being enabled and will help us legitimately pass through spam filters.
So we’ve created a structurally-sound template, we’re preparing to send our email to a permission-based list of subscribers and we’ve taken steps to see our list email-address into the address books of the said subscribers. There are still a number of people on our lists who will intentionally block images, and therefore we should account for that scenario.
I wrote an article outlining a technique for this very purpose. With the releases of Yahoo Mail Beta and Windows Live Mail we lose the ability to integrate the aforementioned technique. However, Ryan Kennedy from the Yahoo Mail team has pointed out that they are looking into potential resolutions for this obstacle.
Positioning aside, there are some things we can do to retain the integrity of our emails when images are disabled:
Again, this is something which should seem obvious. But image-based emails are often practiced as a simple, easy method of delivering a pretty design irrespective of the rendering circus among the array of common email-clients. When we ponder image blocking as part of the rendering equation, it’s easy to see how an image-based email could be completely destroyed with a single preference. Furthermore, this doesn’t take into consideration file sizes for mobile/dial-up recipients, accessibility for those visually impaired or the HTML-to-text ratio that popular spam filters apply with their algorithms.
In summary, we should be giving serious consideration to image-blocking and what we can do about it. It’s natural and reasonable why people disable them, but with the right approach we can improve the experience for our subscribers.