If you, or your clients send email into Canada, it’s high time you oriented yourself with Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL), due to come into effect in 2013. With fines of up to $10 million CAD in place for non-compliance, it’s also a very costly law to get on the wrong side of.

The good news is that if you already abide by Campaign Monitor’s anti-spam policy, you’re most probably already in the clear. However, it’s worth taking the opportunity to review your subscribe forms and other channels by which you allow subscribers to opt-in to your lists, to make sure they abide by CASL’s requirements.

Before you say, ‘well, this doesn’t apply to me’, an interesting thing to note is that CASL can come into effect even if the end recipient isn’t based in Canada. If an email message is routed in Canadian territory (such as by an ISP’s mail server), then it’s expected to abide by the legislation. Given the distributed nature of the Internet, its unwise to make any assumptions about how email travels from our mail servers (which are based in the US, mind) to their final destinations.

Stricter opt-in requirements

The CASL requirements most likely to affect email senders are in regards to ‘express consent‘, or how senders gain permission to email subscribers. Under the law, a sender must state:

What this means is that subscribe forms in particular have to carefully state why email addresses are being collected and who is collecting them. This can be as simple as a message like:

Sign up for ABC Widgets’ weekly email newsletter. We’ll be sending you offers and information about our products – don’t worry, we won’t share your email with anyone and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If this seems a little wordy, it’s because we’re covering all bases – for one, CASL requires that email campaigns feature an unsubscribe mechanism, which is something we want to inform subscribers of prior to opting-in. If you send using Campaign Monitor, an unsubscribe link is a standard part of your campaigns.

On a related note, the CASL unsubscribe requirement also applies to transactional email – Word to the Wise wrote a strong argument for featuring unsubscribe links in both recurring and one-off sends.

Featuring contact information in campaigns

The second big requirement is that email campaigns include information that personally identifies the sender. This information must be correct for at least 60 days after the message is sent. Contact information should include a name or company name, a postal address, or phone number that you or your client can be contacted on. Our template builder creates templates with an editable space in the footer for including contact information.

Finally, the From: address in your campaigns should be real and regularly-monitored – here’s why a no-reply address is an email marketing no-no.

Don’t forget your permission reminders

These changes in the law are also a solid prompt to check your permission reminders. While not a requirement, permission reminders do help keep spam complaints to a minimum. Even a short message like…

You are receiving this email because you signed up for ABC Widgets’ weekly newsletter on our site

… can make all the difference. Subscribers may forget that they’ve signed up for a list and at first glance, assume a message is spam. Sometimes a little prompting like this can be all it takes to jog the memory.

This new Canadian law may have been dubbed ‘the toughest anti-spam law the world has ever seen‘, but in reality, it’s fairly easy for legitimate senders to abide by. Secondly, it’s for the good of all – similar anti-spam legislation in Australia resulted in a measurable decrease in spam traffic following its introduction in 2003. We think the Canadian approach is a step in the right direction when it comes to distinguishing the awesome campaigns we send from email spam and security threats – hopefully it will prove to be a great model for other countries to follow.

Do you think that Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation is a good thing for email senders? Do similar laws exist in your country? Let us know in the comments below.

  • http://tvjames.blogspot.com James Lamb

    Does most BlackBerry traffic still flow through Canada?

    (agree on black font – looks great here as I type)

  • http://yahoo.com evil-Adam

    Guys… please change the font to papyrus. It looks much better in grey.

  • http://www.campaignmonitor.com/our-story/meet-the-team/#rosh Ros Hodgekiss

    Hah, fellas please… Papyrus? Comic sans, my friends. ;) I’ll pass on your feedback to our design folks – we’ll see what can be done. Thanks for your feedback!

  • CRS

    “If you, or your clients send email into Canada” – not true – the new laws don’t affect foreign companies – it can only apply to Canadian companies. A country’s law cannot extend past its borders (unless you’re the FBI of course :P).

  • http://www.campaignmonitor.com/our-story/meet-the-team/#rosh Ros Hodgekiss

    Hey there CRS, I’m not a lawyer, but Fasken Martineu’s commentary suggests otherwise:

    “FISA (ie. the Canadian Anti-Spam Legislation) sets out rules that must be followed by anyone sending an “electronic message” that is sent or accessed from a computer system in Canada.[23] As a consequence, electronic communications sent from computer systems located and controlled from outside of Canada may come under the jurisdiction of FISA, if a computer system located in Canada either accesses, or has routed through it, the message. This provides a wide jurisdictional scope to FISA.”

    Considering the US has previously extradited spammers, this shouldn’t be particularly welcome news to the bad folks, eh? :)

  • Adam

    Guys… please change the font to black. It’s much easier to read than this grey one.

  • http://2rm.com Dan Johnson

    I’ve seen that enforcement for this law is now set to begin July 1, 2014. Assuming that means the 3-year transition period for limited exceptions ends July 1, 2017. Sounds like that gives us some time to collect affirmative permission on any questionable records.

    Any updates on how this may be enforced or any new interpretations?

  • http://www.campaignmonitor.com/our-story/meet-the-team/#rosh Ros Hodgekiss

    Hi Dan, our advice to people with questionable subscriber permission is to either a) don’t send, or b) send a re-engagement campaign first. Email service provider policies (like our anti-spam one) tend to be as strict (if not stricter) than many national spam laws, so if you’re sending, it’s advisable to be sure of your permission now, not later. :)

  • http://www.gkmedia.com Kelly Patchet

    Email is just the tip of the iceberg here in Canada when it comes to CASL – it goes way, way beyond that to all computer programs (including in cars and appliances). I’ve been saying for a while, the email bit is just catching up to what CM expects anyway but the rest is a huge and convoluted mess that most companies won’t be able to comply with. #absurd

  • http://manoverboard.com Andrew Boardman

    Great forward-looking post, CM, as always. If you could keep us up to date on all things CASL from your point of view, we’d appreciate it. The legislation is pretty new (or will be on July 1, 2014) and all businesses and organizations here need to comply.

  • http://www.campaignmonitor.com/our-story/meet-the-team/#rosh Ros Hodgekiss

    Thank you, Andrew. We’ll most certainly keep an eye on things here and post in our blog / update this resource if conditions change.

  • http://www.lireo.com/ Deborah Edwards-Onoro

    One of my Twitter followers is a member of a social media group in Vancouver, Canada. At their May meeting, an attorney told the group that sending the unsubscribe confirmation message (you’re been unsubscribed from this list, etc.) to the person who unsubscribed is a violation of CASL.

    I’ve searched, but haven’t found anything that confirms that’s true. I know many mailing lists send that unsubscribe confirmation message as a default. Do you have any background on this issue?

  • Chris Bowler

    Hi Deborah,

    That’s a great question! You can review the documentation provided by the government of Canada here: http://fightspam.gc.ca/eic/site/030.nsf/eng/00258.html But that is the first time I’ve heard of this after reading a good bit of documentation.

    Most tools that provide an unsubscribe mechanism redirect the user to a web based confirmation page rather than sending another email. This is how our service works and may be why you don’t see a lot of writing on the topic.

  • http://www.lireo.com/ Deborah

    Thanks Chris. Yes, I’ve visited that site. I still haven’t found any supporting documentation to indicate it’s a violation. Trying to get more info from the Meetup group.

    Good to know your service directs to a web page. Do Campaign Monitor clients have option to send an unsubscribe email message?

  • http://www.campaignmonitor.com Stephen Jesson

    Hi Deborah,

    Thanks for following up and no problem at all, we’re happy to help!

    Just to clarify, we do not allow the sending of an unsubscription confirmation email at this time, however it is possible to send individuals to a custom unsubscription confirmation page, as per:

    In addition, you’re able to create an exit survey for your unsubscribers if you wish, as per:

    Thanks again and hope that helps!

  • http://siatris.qc.ca/ Mylene Bruneau

    In Canada, many big companies are now sending emails to their list, asking the customer to click to confirm they still want to be on the sending list, a great way if you are not sure about your list. Here’s my question : is there a way to do that with Campaign Monitor ? An email that would say Click here to confirm your subscription. As an example, I got one from Sony. When I click, it directs me to a page asking yes or no. That page manages the mailing list I suppose… How to do that with CM ? Thank you. Example link : https://customer.sony.ca/crm/Subscribe.do?bpguid=42ED7E0D66891C31E10000002B9E0A12&langId=-1

  • Chris Bowler

    Hi Mylene,

    Thanks for the question. Yes, you are able to set up a reconfirmation campaign with your Campaign Monitor account. You can read how to do that here:


    I hope that helps!

  • http://www.felliniaerographics.com Michael

    Can express consent be acquired by having the potential client reply to my consent email by saying “Yes, I consent” in the subject field?

  • http://www.siatris.qc.ca Mylene

    Thank you Chris, I followed the steps in that link, but it doesn’t work. I put that link in the email (http://campagnecourriel.siatris.qc.ca/t/1/s/d/?cm-tktyei-tktyei=email&cm;-name=fullname, fallback=]) but when I send the test, the link goes on an error page ; Invalid Email Address
    Sorry, but the email address you supplied was invalid and needs to be fixed before you can subscribe to this list. I tried with random recipient AND fallback terms AND writing it in the url direct. Nothing works…

  • Chris Bowler

    Hi Mylene,

    You’ll definitely want to get in touch with our support team then and we can look into things for you: http://help.campaignmonitor.com/support

    Michael, that may suffice, but getting legal advice may be a good idea. Having a new list created with all the “reconfirmed” addresses is definitely the best way to go. And as shared in the comments above, this is how you can populate that list: http://help.campaignmonitor.com/topic.aspx?t=225

  • http://www.siatris.qc.ca Mylene

    Thank you Chris, your help email solved it!

    A reminder to fellow Canadian users : the law will be effective and applied starting July 1st, 2014. This is the link to the detailed law: http://goo.gl/kejSqY

    And yes, this step-by-step guide is the way to comply to it: http://help.campaignmonitor.com/topic.aspx?t=225

  • Chris Bowler

    That’s great to hear, Mylene. Thanks for following up!

  • Ian Russell

    All the subscribers on our list would have opted in at some point. Some of them may have done so several years ago, but they would have received many emails with an opt-out message since.

    Since I am pretty confident about our subscriber list, and since subscribers will all have the option to unsubscribe from the email, I’m not sure why I would spam them with a new confirmation email right now.

    My inbox is filled with this things from worried companies. Is it mandatory to send out a confirmation email, or is this just misinformation spreading?

  • Tash Sallie

    Hey Ian,

    Prior express consent actually still applies, meaning subscribers who explicitly
    agreed to regular emails from you will not need to give permission a second time.

    The confirmation is recommended if you’re unsure whether all of your recipients have specifically agreed to receive regular emails.

  • Ian Russell

    Thanks Tash! I think that people are generally being overzealous about it then. I don’t think I’ll harass our recipients.

Want to improve your email marketing? Subscribe to get tips on improving your email marketing delivered to your inbox.

Join 150,000 companies around the world that use Campaign Monitor to run email marketing campaigns that deliver results for their business.

Get started for free